Why government sucks: myth vs. reality

The government sucks. Everybody knows it.

It’s true that people tolerate it, seeing it as a “necessary evil” or at the very least better than the alternative – which many people imagine would be a Mad Max world of leather-clad violent gangs raping and pillaging everyone else in society without consequences. Fear, obviously, is a powerful motivator for supporting an institution that everybody hates.

“Hold on just a second there, buddy”, I can hear you saying, “Roads don’t suck. Protection from gangs and thugs and warlords doesn’t suck. Providing sustenance to the poor and elderly doesn’t suck.”. Well, let me stop you right there and agree with you – these services do not suck at all.

What does suck is the method some people choose to provide such services – government. Even if you think it is a “necessary evil”, if you’re honest with yourself, you would at least admit you have a love/hate relationship with it.

The myth:

Government sucks because the people suck, and the government is just the will of the people.

The Reality

In the United States, only 30% of the population actually vote. Out of a population of over 300 million, 131.3 million are both eligible to vote (not a felon, over 18) and have registered to vote. Of them, about 50% (on average) and 70% (in a “good” year) actually turn out to vote. So of a population of 300 million, about 90 Million, or 30% of the population, actually vote.

Of those 90 million, many are “defensive” voters – not voting for a candidate that they like, but voting against a candidate that they do not want in power.

Even with people that vote “for” a candidate, many of them are uninformed or misinformed, not because they ’suck’, but because of the constant stream of bullshit that comes out of the white house.

For instance, does anyone remember that we went into Iraq because of WMDs anymore? Many people accepted it when that “information” first came out back in 2002, even some anti-war hippy pacifists, who were arguing (quite reasonably) that we would be hypocritical if we condemned another country for stockpiling weapons of mass destruction when our government has enough nukes to destroy the planet several times over. However, the debate itself was framed around this “fact” that was spread by the government – our entire debate was based on a lie, as usual.

Did anyone VOTE to lie to the American people? No. It’s not all people. Just the ones who work in government.

You might say, however, that, according to democratic theory, the government is, to the extent that democratic forms actually function properly, the people. However, there are hundreds of filters – media organizations, political campaign contributions, exclusive and elitist social networks, among others, that pre-determine who the masses are actually allowed to vote for. The choices are dramatically limited to handful of people. And these people know play by the rules of a game of power that you don’t even know is being played.

Also, there is never any option to “opt out” of the consequences of decisions that you disagree with, EVEN IF YOU ARE IN THE MAJORITY.

So the reality is not that ALL people suck, or even that MOST people suck. The problem is that a small minority of people suck, and these people can be divided into two groups: 1) Those the state usually points to them to “prove” it’s necessity (or legitimacy), and 2) those that work in government in the first place.

The myth:

Government sucks because of capitalism’s corrupting influence.

The Reality

Capitalism exists independently of any “system” of government controls to limit it. Capitalism doesn’t corrupt government. Quite the opposite. Whenever you have a group of people that claim the legal right to initiate violence to control other people, the predictable consequences of this is that unscrupulous, unethical, immoral people will seek to control it, because of an incontrovertible truism:

Power over others attracts those that seek power over others.

The myth:

Government sucks because the wrong people are in control.

The Reality

The wrong people will ALWAYS be in control, depending on your perspective. There’s nothing wrong with choosing a leader FOR YOURSELF, but when YOU choose a leader which affects OTHERS, it will invariably be the wrong people in control for THEM.

Besides, the only real difference between the government and every other kind of institution on the planet is a monopoly on violence. Don’t believe me? Would you take Obama’s word for it?

Seriously. That’s about it. EVERYTHING the government does is based on violence and coercion, even the “good” stuff, as it pays for all of that good stuff through taxation, which is a euphemism for “taking money against your will under the threat of violence”. “Violence”, in this case, usually means a series of threats until a couple of guys with guns come to your house, tie you up, throw you in a car, haul you off to a building surrounded by barbed wire and armed guards, and thrown in a cage that is famous for being a place where people are beaten and raped.

Do you really think that kind of power attracts the most noble and virtuous among us?

Why the confusion?

We were raised in public schools. We have been inculcated from birth with the idea of a “nation state”, as if it is the most natural way for humans to organize. We are taught to be patriotic and tribal in just about every sports game, war movie, and news broadcast in this country. We are all brainwashed into believing this insane notion that giving a small group a bunch of guns is going to solve our problems.

Like just about everything else that comes out of the mouths of politicians, we were lied to. There is a better way to organize society, and every way has a first step, and that first step is acknowledging, not fighting, not demanding, not “doing” anything, but ACKNOWLEDGING the FACT that YOU ARE FREE, and recognizing the awesome responsibility you have to make the world a better place, not by threatening others, but by helping them.

Spread the word
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Blogplay
  • Blogosphere News
  • email
  • Fark
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
 

I am a statist shitheel

This post was deleted from my website by somebody stupid enough not to understand what google cache is. I got the cache and re-uploaded this post.

This morning I was awoken by my alarm clock, manufactured and sold on the free market and powered by the electricity I am forced to use by the power monopoly regulated by the US department of energy.

I then took a shower in water filled with pharmaceuticals provided by the municipal water utility, and paid for by me, based both on my own voluntary usage, and by force, through taxation, whether I want to or not, as there is no competition.

After that, I turned on the TV I paid for on the free market to find a bunch of homogenized, dull, and mind-numbing programs censored and controlled by the FCC.

I watched this while eating my breakfast of US department of agriculture accepted food and taking the drugs which have been determined as safe by the food and drug administration. The US, of course, has some of the worst health issues in the world, but this is most likely due to the fact that the hundreds of thousands of laws regulating our food just aren’t enough.

At the appropriate time as regulated by the state, because only the state can make clocks accurate (except during “daylight savings time”, for reasons nobody can clearly understand or explain), I get into a vehicle that must be acceptable to the state, and drive on roads that I am forced to pay for by the state, where I can be pulled over an harassed by agents of the state. I stop to purchase additional fuel taxed by the state, using the only currency the state allows me to use.

On the way out the door I don’t deposit mail via the US postal service, because I never use it anymore since the invention of email and FedEx, and drop the kids off at the public indoctrination centers where they will be taught to shut up and obey authority, to think of education as a boring, tedious chore, and be herded around from class to class and forced to engage in humiliating exercises to teach them just enough to be used as tax livestock when they graduate.

After spending another day not being maimed or killed at work thanks to my own common senses, as well as advancements in technology, I ignore the hundreds of thousands of workplace regulations imposed by the state because nothing would ever get done otherwise. I eat another two meals which, again, kill me slowly because the USDA just doesn’t have ENOUGH regulation. I drive my state-sanctioned car back home on the only roads that exist, pay the tolls to pay for the road I’m already forced to pay for via taxes, and go to my house which has not burned down in my absence because I’m not an idiot and realize the building codes don’t prevent the thousands of fires in the US every year, nor the 3,320 deaths a year caused by fire. My house has not been plundered of all it’s valuables, no thanks to the local police department, who failed to stop two previous burglaries, so now I have an alarm, which is actually effective.

I then log on to the internet and go on web sites created on the free market, using the http protocol, which was developed on the free market, made up of HTML, which was developed by the free market, all running on servers, data lines, backbones, and routers all created by the free market, and using the tcp/ip protocol which is a protocol created by a PRIVATE standards body, which is an evolution of a protocol which was developed by the defense advanced research projects administration, and post about how SOCIALISM is GOOD because the I don’t understand that the government’s only real tool for funding any of it’s programs is VIOLENCE.

Spread the word
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Blogplay
  • Blogosphere News
  • email
  • Fark
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
 

Your Fascist Superhero (MIRROR)

Originally uploaded here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ey0zU879yQ

By YouTube user “RjWeapon”:
http://www.youtube.com/user/RjWeapon

Spread the word
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Blogplay
  • Blogosphere News
  • email
  • Fark
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
 

Fundraising Techniques Approved by the State

Imagine yourself in the worst of circumstances – the government has collapsed, and the world, including the neighborhood that you live in, has turned to chaos.

Roving bands of Mad-Max style hooligans suddenly appear out of nowhere! Fires are burning all over the town. The food supply has disappeared – cars and truck have no fuel! Electricity is gone. Bridges, roads, and schools are crumbling! Cats are sleeping with dogs! It’s pandemonium.

The first thing that needs to be done is to set up some kind of police force to protect your neighborhood from all of these crazy bikers dressed in cut-up tires and leather jackets.

So, you go to all the people in your neighborhood (with a gun, of course), and you try to gather up as many like-minded people as possible. You soon find out that a certain percentage agree with you and are willing to help you defend the neighborhood. You pool some resources together and soon you have your own police force – 5 guys, armed with guns and walky-talkies, who take turns patrolling the area.

You feel safe, but then, your neighborhood is attacked by a gang of 20 people, armed with more guns than you have. They come in, take lots of food, kill a few of your neighbors, rape the women. It’s a horrifying, nightmarish scenario, but you managed to capture one of them, and lock him in a well-secured basement.

You realize that you need to organize more people in the neighborhood to fight back, but the original group of people just isn’t enough. You need more help.

What do you do?

“I got an idea!”, says on of the 5 men. “We have guns, why don’t we pay other people whod didn’t want to volunteer? We’ll give them food in exchange for being on force, in addition to the protection we’ll all get”.

“Good idea”, you say. ” but…how would we get the food?”

“That’s easy”, he says, “We’ll just go to the people in the neighborhood who didn’t voluntary want to help and demand that they help us OR ELSE!”.

“Hmm. Interesting idea”, you say, “but… or else WHAT?”.

“Or else”, the man says, “we send a couple guys to their house with guns, tie them up, throw them in a car, drive them to your house, and lock them in the basement with the one guy we caught, who will most likely rape them.”. The man goes on to explain. “We would probably only have to do this once. Once everybody else in the neighborhood finds out, they will be so frightened that they will give us what we need, and we can support the extra guys we need to protect the neighborhood.”

“Fantastic idea”, you say, as you acknowledge the how sensible and virtuous the suggestion is. You can’t believe you hadn’t thought of it yourself.

Spread the word
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Blogplay
  • Blogosphere News
  • email
  • Fark
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
 

“The Story of Creation” by TheThinkingAtheist

This is from a brilliant video blogger that I highly recommend:

youtube.com/TheThinkingAtheist

Spread the word
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Blogplay
  • Blogosphere News
  • email
  • Fark
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
Tagged with:
 

Two Cows

COMMUNISM: You have two cows. A bunch of people threaten to kill you if you don’t milk them and give the milk to other people. You feel lonely and powerless inside.

CAPITALISM: You only have one cow. Sucks to be you. I, on the other hand, have 5 cows. You wanna be my bitch?

AMERICAN LIBERALISM: You have two cows. There’s a guy who has 300 cows. You give one of your cows to the government because you want “the people” to have more cows than the guy who has the most cows. You trust the government to give the cows to the people who have the least cows. The government gives ALL the cows to the guy who has the most cows anyway and a policeman fucks your other cow up the ass.

AMERICAN CONSERVATISM: You have two cows. You pray that they will mate. You pray that it is God’s wills that you build an empire of cows. You give one to the government because they tell you that there are demons from other countries that steal cows. You see that you don’t have as many cows as god wills, and you blame it on the people who have less cows than you.

ANARCHISM: You have two cows. They are yours. You must defend them if you want to keep them. You seek out alliances with neighbors, and even form cooperatives to ensure the proper distribution of milk. You sell milk to other people in exchange for bread, firewood, televisions, computers, money, gold, whatever. Most of the time, nobody is trying to take your cows, but there are a couple of mafia thugs in uniform that claim they have the RIGHT to take you cows. There are no cops to call. You arm yourself and help other like-minded people to arm themselves as well. You become the best “cop” you know how to be so you can protect yourself and your neighbors from these mafia thugs. You are forced to take responsibility for things you didn’t take responsibility for before. You find out that you were afraid of a paper tiger all along, and that the only one you can truly count on to change things is yourself. You stop paying taxes. You understand the nature of your reality, and what we all must do to protect our freedoms. We fight off the men in uniform together. In all the excitement, we miss seeing the cows having a baby.

Spread the word
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Blogplay
  • Blogosphere News
  • email
  • Fark
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

A typical discussion with a theist.

This is an example of a typical discussion with a theist.

Theist: “Okay okay. I understand that you have become very irritated because of me. I will stop, but first, I’ve got something to say. Please read it with an open heart, so that you may realize that you have only one chance.”

Me: “Only one chance? That sounds serious. What is it that I have ‘only one chance’ to do?”

Theist: “I hope you are having a wonderful time doing whatever you are doing. I just wanted to share this with you:”

Me: “I’m glad you can share.”

Theist: “I know it’s something you may not like to think about, but I have a very important reason for wanting to remind you that; you are part of the ultimate statistic, 10 out of 10 people die.”

Me: “Oh, hey. I’m an existentialist. Say no more. I understand my mortality and take it very seriously. Go on…”

Theist: ” One day your heart will stop beating and you will be dead! The Bible states that you’ll then be judged by The holy and righteous God who created this universe, for every word, thought and action in your life.”

Me: “What? You were just talking about the fact that this is the only life we have to live, and now you’re talking about God? Some afterlife? It sounds to me like you’re the one who’s not taking your mortality seriously.”

Theist: “Would you consider yourself to be a good person?”

Me: “There are different ranges of people. I would say that I’m ‘better’ than some people and ‘worse’ than others. After all, I can’t exactly compete with Ghandi.”

Theist: “The Bible says in Proverbs 20:6 Most men will proclaim every one his own goodness Lets see if you qualify as being a good person.”

Me: “I don’t think the Bible is a ‘good’ book. It contains stories of genocide and some of the most vile crimes against humanity ever committed. The God of the Bible is an evil, vindictive person. Why would I care what the Bible says about what is ‘good’ and ‘evil’. The Bible is clearly evil to anyone who has read it.”

Theist : “Have you ever told a lie?”

Me: “Sure. I think it’s safe to say that most people have.”.

Theist: “Have you ever stolen anything, irrespective of its value?”

Me: “When I was a kid, yes. I don’t steal anymore, however, unless you include copyright infringement. It’s practically impossible not to in this day and age.”

Theist: “Jesus said, I tell you that anyone who looks at a woman lustfully has already committed adultery with her in his heart (Matthew 5:28). Have you ever looked at someone with lust?”

Me: “Of course I have. It’s in my biological nature. Any species without a sex drive won’t reproduce.”

Theist: “The Bible says that if someone hates another person they are a murderer (I John 3:15). Have you ever hated anyone?”

Me: “I hate Hitler. Wait – are you saying that makes me a bad person?”

Theist: “If you have answered Yes to the previous questions, then you have admitted that you are a liar, a thief, an adulterer and a murderer”

Me: “Uh, no. You’re just parroting some Bible-thumping idiot who doesn’t understand the issues. I’m not a ‘liar’. A ‘liar’ is somebody you can’t trust to tell the truth. We USE THAT WORD to distinguish people who we CAN trust to tell the truth from people we can’t. If EVERYONE is a ‘liar’, as you suggest, then the word means nothing. Same thing goes with the word ‘theif’. I’m not going to steal from you, because I’m not a thief. Yes, I may have violated copyright or stolen something when I was a kid, but that DOES NOT define who I am. I may have fixed a pipe or two, but that doesn’t make me a plumber. I may have gotten into a couple fights in my life, but that doesn’t make me a street punk. I may have broken a law a couple of times, but that does not make me a criminal. You’re argument is based purely one a POOR UNDERSTANDING OF SEMANTICS.”

Theist: “…and weve[sic] only looked at 4 of the 10 Commandments. If God were to judge you by this standard would you be innocent or guilty? You know you are guilty and deserving of an eternity in Hell.”

Me: “If God were to judge me by that kind of standard? What would you say about a government that judged you by that kind of standard? Would you vote for that party in the next election? A party that commits, not even ETERNAL torture, but just a FEW HOURS of torture for people who violated these standards? Would you vote for them? Would you say that they are moral, ethical people?”

Theist: “God is absolutely perfect and He hates sin, the Bible warns that if you are guilty you will end up in Hell.”

Me: “PERFECTION? The standard is PERFECTION? NOBODY meets that standard. You’re trying to say that you think someone is threatening you with TORTURE for not meeting the standard of PERFECTION??? That’s AWEFUL. I’m sorry for you. I really am.”

Theist: “That’s not God’s will. He sent His Son to suffer and die on the cross for you. Jesus took your punishment upon Himself: “God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life.” Then He rose from the dead and defeated death. ”

Me: “WHAT? He sent his SON to die for me? I DON’T EVEN KNOW HIS SON! He has got to be the worst parent I’ve ever known. That’s HORRIBLE. To subject his own son to that kind of pain! And for what? To protect ME? From what? HIS OWN CRUEL JUDGMENT to torture ME for not being PERFECT? Oh, GOD! I feel AWEFUL! This guy God is a PRICK! What a collosal DOUCHE – BAG”

Theist: “Please, repent (turn from your sin) today and trust in Jesus, and God will grant you everlasting life.”

Me: “Oh, so I kiss his ass and he will reward me, huh? FUCK THAT! I’m buying a gun! This person you are talking about is the WORST PERSON I’VE EVER HEARD ABOUT. I’m sick to my stomach now just knowing that he exists. Oh, wait. That’s right – he DOESN’T. ”

Theist: “Then read your Bible daily and obey it.”

Me: “I’ve read the Bible. That’s WHY I’m an atheist. Why are you this thick? Why can’t you understand this?”

Theist: “May God bless you.”

Me: “What? I don’t want that prick’s blessing.”

OK, donovanrules123123, I’m sure you’ve gotten my point by now. I’m also pretty sure that you’ve ignored it.

You are not honest. You are a dishonest, unethical person. I could never support somebody as evil as the one you claim to worship. You’re obedience to him is an act of cowardice, not compassion. It is an act of fear, not courage. It is an act of selfishness, not altruism. You, sir, are a despicable human being, and will remain so until you realize that life is precious, that freedom is mandatory, and that oppression is unacceptable.”

Spread the word
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Blogplay
  • Blogosphere News
  • email
  • Fark
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

Why the arguments for God’s existence are wrong

There are many arguments for God’s existence.

They range from the absurd to the compelling.

Teleological argument

Sometimes called the “argument from design” or the “fine-tuning argument”, the teleological argument, I believe, is the most persuasive. After all, how is it possible that a sunset is the product of chance? Why are flowers so beautiful?

You and I are very lucky to be alive. We live in a world filled with beauty and wonder, a world of near limitless possibilities. There is so much to learn, to experience, and to share with others. We hit the cosmic jackpot.

Obviously, this was all designed. When we look at the elegance of a cheetah running through the African plains, we know that it had to have been designed. It couldn’t possibly be the product of random chance.

If we look at a painting, we know there must be a painter. If we look at a watch, we know there must be a watchmaker. Surely, when we look at the machinery of nature, which is much more beatiful than any painting, and much more complex than any watch, we are struck with awe and the knowledge that this must have been designed.

The fallacy:

First off, we’re being selective. The vast majority of the universe is deadly to human life. If you weren’t on this planet, you would most likely die almost instantly, either from the vacuum or the freezing cold of space, the unbreathable, toxic atmosphere of another planet, or the massive heat and energy from a star.

Even on this planet, we’re faced with the reality that the majority of it is inhospitable to human life, which, at the very least, doesn’t help the argument that the universe, or even the earth, was designed specifically with humans in mind.

Then, of course, there are the earthquakes, tsunamis, plagues, deformed babies, vicious predators, tornadoes, hurricanes, floods, meteor impacts, droughts, psychological disorders, and many other examples of cruelty, violence, and the cold, uncaring and brutal disasters that this “intelligently designed” planet has to offer.

I know, I know – you have excuses, eh, reasons for this, involving Satan and the fall of man, because there is obviously a logical connection between a man eating from a magic tree and a tsunami killing hundreds of thousands of people in Indonesia. Maybe there is, but you don’t really believe in God because of that, do you? No, you believe in God for another reason.

Cosmological argument – Argument from first cause. Nothing can come from nothing.

Obviously, something can not come from “nothing”. Everything we observe in the universe comes from something else that pre-existed it. The logical conclusion to this is that the universe itself ALSO needed a pre-cursor, and this pre-cursor is obviously best described as the particular god that you believe in.

The fallacy:

There are actually several things I believe are wrong with the cosmological argument. For one, it is entirely dependent on unknowns. We don’t know what happened before the big bang, therefor there was a first cause? We don’t know what could exist outside of the known universe, therefor it is this first cause? We don’t even know if this universe had a beginning. However, this is completely irrelevant. In fact, let’s assume that the cosmological argument is completely, 100% valid. What does it actually prove if it is?

It proves two things:
1) That there was a “pre-cursor” to this universe.
2) This “pre-cursor” operates outside of known space-time.

And it suggests one:
1) This “pre-cursor” may have massive amounts of energy.

That’s it. Nowhere in this argument can we get extrapolate ANY ADDITIONAL ATTRIBUTES about this first cause, such as omniscience, omnipresence, omnipotence, or even sentience. We simply DEFINE god as meeting those minimum requirements, and then ASSUME that he is the first cause, with all of his OTHER ATTRIBUTES, however unestablished by the argument.

Transendental argument – Argument from Reason. Truth must be based on something.

All logical arguments must be BASED on first principals. These first principals must be universal and can not be transient. If you do not have any universal, immutable, eternal first principals to base your argument on, the argument is inherently invalid. Since God meets the criteria of being the source of such first principals, only he has the “ontological stature” to be the source of such first principals. Thus, only belief in a supreme being can be logical, as any argument from a non-believer can not be valid because there is no foundation for the logic that they use.

The fallacy:

This one is very easy to see through, and can best be answered with a question:
Where does god get his “first principals” from?

In other words, is a statement logical because it truly flows from first principals, or is it logical because GOD SAYS it is?

If the laws truly are immutable, then God is BOUND by them himself (It logical because it is logical, not because god says so). If that’s the case, we do not need a god to explain them.

However, if God is the SOURCE of logic, then they are dependent on him and NOT immutable, eternal, and universal. God could say that A = B and !B at the same time, and we would all be slaves to this “logic”.

Finally, when we are talking about “logic”, what we are actually talking about is inside our own heads, a way to understand our reality. We debate and discuss to find flaws in our thinking. We study the universe to see if our principals really apply “universally”. I believe it is important to note, though, that the term “universal” here is limited by our own perceptions of the universe.

Our REALITY is the basis for our logic. That “immutable” ground for such reasoning is the universe we live in, not anything apart from or outside of it, and it is precisely this logic that leads many, including myself, to dismiss the idea of a supreme being.

So why DO you believe in God?

Fear. You’re afraid. You’re afraid of death. You’re afraid of life. You’re afraid of God. You see the problems with the world and you just don’t want to believe it. You see the injustices in the world and you just don’t want them to go unpunished. You see the corruption, the lies, the death, the betrayal, and all of the agony that goes along with life, and you hate it, and rightfully so. I hate it, too.

I’m also afraid. I’m afraid that we won’t wake up and realize that we have some serious problems in the world that won’t be solved by folding our hands and talking to the sky. I’m afraid that we won’t be able to answer 21st century questions with ancient texts. I’m afraid that we’re wasting too many resources arguing about which one of these beings is the “real” one, and far too much time and effort in a futile attempt to please a non-existent being.

Spread the word
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Blogplay
  • Blogosphere News
  • email
  • Fark
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

Do you love your country? Do you admire George Washington? Feel a sense of nostalgia when you look at the flag? Do you love living in a place where you can learn, grow, work hard and become wealthy? Do you take pride in the accomplishments of other Americans, like Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Edison, and Alexander Graham Bell? Do you like eating a hotdog and drinking a beer at the game? Do you like Star Wars and other American movie classics? Do you love going to see the latest blockbuster? This is our country. This is a culture that has spread all over the world, and you and I call it home.

Please, don’t ever confuse our country with our government.

If you’re even remotely aware of your environment, you will at least acknowledge that there’s “something” wrong with our government. You don’t have to be a right-wing nutjob or a conspiracy theorist to feel it. You might not be able to put your finger on it, but you know it’s there. As Bob Dylan put it, “you don’t have to be a weatherman to know which way the wind blows”.

However, it’s not what we’re not sure about that troubles me. Sure, the conspiracy theorists may be right. For all I know, the reptilian overlords from planet X may be initiating their plan to enslave us all as we speak. However, it’s the conspiracy that you and I are a part of that I think is the most insidious. It is a conspiracy of ignorance and silence. It is a conspiracy of cowardice.

We know the following things are true, but we ignore them, like an old man who refuses to admit he needs to see a doctor.

1) It’s all based on violence.
Do you want to help those who need medical care? Do you want to give food to the starving? Do you want to teach the children who can’t afford an education? Do you want to build infrastructure and make your country the best in the world? With our current system, it’s all based on violence.

EVERYTHING the government does is paid for by taxation – either direct taxation or future taxation in the form of loans, and all of it is taken from people against their will.

How does the government collect tax? By demanding it from YOU and everyone else. What happens if you refuse? Mostly paperwork, but eventually, if you keep refusing, it will come to the point where the men with guns come to tie you up, haul you away, and stuff you in a cage away from your family.

Why don’t people want to go to prison? Because they don’t want to lose their freedom, sure. But mostly because they don’t want to be beaten and raped.

So, all of those programs that you are so proud of? They are there because people pay for them under the threat of being raped or killed in prison.

[Edit - David M Zuniga, P.E. posted this link making a lot of claims that you might want to check out. He also improperly criticized me for claiming that IRS agents are the "men with guns", among other things. The men with guns I was referring to are police officers and Federal agents, as was the case with Ed and Elaine Brown. ]

2) Government is the biggest polluter on the planet.
Don’t you hate those greedy, capitalist pigs that dump chemicals into the ocean and clog up our air with toxins? ME TOO! In fact, I once thought it would be a good idea to completely destroy the biggest polluter on the planet to set an example.  Now that I know that the #1 polluter in the world is the U.S. Government, I think it’s a GREAT idea.

3) The conspiracy theorists were right.
No, not the guys who talk about JFK or 9/11. That remains to be seen (though I’m sure there are millions of die-hard “independent researchers” out there that could talk my ear off). However, there are many stories about the government that were once thought to be far too evil and malicious to have any truth to them. Performing mind control experiments on citizens who were unaware of them? NONESENSE! Right? Wrong. It’s all true. That was called “MK-ULTRA“.

But surely the government wouldn’t be infiltrating citizen activist groups in order to disrupt their operation? The government wouldn’t, for instance, intentionally spread lies or rumors about public speakers in order to discredit them before they could speak, right? The government couldn’t POSSIBLY be responsible for encouraging black militant groups to hate and distrust each other by sending false messages to each group, leading to several deaths, right?  WRONG! That was called “COINTELPRO“.

4) It doesn’t matter who you vote for.
Sure, you can vote, but let’s face it, you’re vote doesn’t count. It never has. The only hope that you can have to ever change things is by creating or joining a movement. Guess who is better at organizing movements than you are? Guess who has more resources and can reach more people than you can? Guess who has hundreds of years experience working with the press, and knows all the tricks to get people like you to look like idiots and people like them looking like saviors?

Even if your tiny, insignificant vote did more than a drop of water in a pool, which it doesn’t, you’re either voting for the puppet on the right or the puppet on the left. The media is constantly feeding you with all of the so-called “differences” between the two camps, but this is easy to see through. It is an attempt to build up this ridiculous notion of a polarized America, as if there are only two ideological belief systems. Strangely enough, however, it seems to be working.

It’s almost as if they deliberately switch back and forth so that one party can blame the other party for poor decisions while simultaneously getting away with other bad decisions, all against the consent of hundreds of millions of people.

5)  It’s all involuntary.
You don’t agree with a policy? Too bad, they have the guns. You think taxes are too high? Too bad. They have the guns. You think the money should be spent differently? Too bad. They have the guns.

To be fair, you do have SOME influence. You can vote, but let’s be honest. There is never any real transfer of power because the people who are really in control are in positions that can’t be voted out in an election.

If we’re going to be honest about our government, we have to look at it for what it really is, and not what we’re constantly told it is, or what we would like it to be.

We are told it is a servant, but we all know it is a master. We are told it is a hero, but we all know that it can also be a villain. We are told that it is a necessary evil, but we all know that it does more evil than is necessary.

Once we’re truly honest with ourselves, we will see the government as it truly is: an experiment that went wrong, a beast of burden that grew so large that it can now stomp all over us.

A monster.

Spread the word
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Blogplay
  • Blogosphere News
  • email
  • Fark
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon